Author Archives: admin

Winter 2013 – The Role of Ultrasound Screening in Reducing AAA Mortality: A Review

Posted on by

The Role of Ultrasound Screening in Reducing AAA Mortality: A Review.
 
Kashif Imran Ahmad.
 
Author Affiliations:
Medical School, Liverpool University, Liverpool, England

 
[button link=”http://msrj.chm.msu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/MSRJ-Winter-2013-The-Role-of-Ultrasound-Screening-in-Reducing-AAA-Mortality-a-Review.pdf” type=”icon” icon=”download” color=green] Full Text Article PDF [/button]

 
Corresponding author: Kashif Imran Ahmad; K.Ahmad[at]Lancaster.ac.uk
 
Key Words: population; screening; ultrasonography; abdominal aortic aneurysms; mortality; systematic review.
 
Abstract:
Men aged 65-79 are at the highest risk of having an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) as well as a high incidence of rupture; this is treated as a surgical emergency, which has a total mortality of 75-90%. The diameter of an AAA proves to be the most useful risk factor in predicting mortality rates.

 
Published: February 27, 2013
 
Senior Editor: Emina Bajrovic
 
Junior Editor: Bobby Gambhir
 
DOI: Pending
 
Citation:
Ahmad KI. The Role of Ultrasound Screening in Reducing AAA Mortality: A Review. Medical Student Research Journal. 2013;2(Winter):3-10.
 
 
References:
1. Marshall G. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm – does it fulfill the criteria for mass screening? Radiography. 1996; 2:3-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1078-8174(96)90029-2.

2. Scott R, Vardulaki K, Walker N, Day N, Duffy S, Ashton H. The long-term benefits of a single scan for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) at age 65. Eur J Vasc Endovasc. 2001; 21:535-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2001.1368.

3. Scott R, Bridgewater S, Ashton H. Randomized clinical trial of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in women. Brit J Surg. 2002; 89:283-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.02014.x.

4. Heronm M, Hoyert D, Murphy S, Xu J, Kochanek K,Tejada-Vera B. Deaths: final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2009; 57(14):34-86. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr57/nvsr57_14.pdf

5. Bown M, Sutton A, Bell P, Sayers R. A meta-analysis of 50 years of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Brit J Surg. 2002; 89:714-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02122.x.

6. UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Long-term outcomes of immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. NEJM. 2002; 346(19):1445-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa013527.

7. Lederle F, Wilson S, Johnson G, et al. Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. NEJM. 2002; 346(19):1437-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012573.

8. NHS (2011). NHS evidence screening. Available from: http://www.library.nhs.uk/screening/SearchResults.aspx?catID=15441&tabID=289&pgIndex0& [cited 15 April 2011].

9. Darling R, Messina C, Brewster D, Ottinger L. Autopsy study of unoperated abdominal aortic aneurysms. The case for early resection. Circulation. 1977; 56(2):161-4.

10. Lederle F, Johnson G, Wilson S, et al. The aneurysm detection and management study screening program: validation cohort and final results. Aneurysm detection and management veterans affairs cooperative study investigators. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160:1425-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.10.1425.

11. Lederle F, Johnson G, Wilson S. Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women. J Vasc Surg. 2001; 34:122-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mva.2001.115275.

12. Lindholt J, Henneberg E, Fasting H, Juul S. Hospital based screening of 65-73 year old men for abdominal aortic aneurysms in the county of Viborg, Denmark. J Med Screen. 1996; 3:43-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/096914139600300111.

13. Vardulaki K, Pervost T, Walker N, et al. Incidence among men of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms: estimates from 500 screen detected cases. J Medl Screen. 1999; 6(1):50-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jms.6.1.50.

14. Earnshaw J, Shaw E, Whyman M, Poskitt K, Heather B. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in men. Brit Med J. 2004; 328(7448):1122-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7448.1122.

15. Kochanek K, Xu J, Murphy S, Miniño A, Kung H. Deaths: preliminary data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011; 59(11):1-69. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr59/nvsr59_04.pdf

16. Gillum R. Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm in the United States. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995; 48:1289-98. http://www.jclinepi.com/article/PII0895435695000453/abstract.

17. Watson JE. Medical-surgical nursing and related physiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W B Saunders; 1979, p. 351.

18. Adam D, Mohan I, Stuart W, Bain M, Bradbury A. Community and hospital outcome from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm within the catchment area of a regional vascular surgical service. J Vasc Surg. 1999; 30:922-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(99)70018-2.

19. Nusbaum J, Freimanis A, Thomford N. Echography in the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Brit J Surg. 1971; 102:385-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1971.01350040147028.

20. Fleming C, Whitlock E, Beil T, Lederrle F. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a best-evidence systematic review for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 142(3):203-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-142-3-200502010-00012.

21. Williamson W, Nicoloff A, Taylor LJ, Moneta G, Landry G, Porter J. Functional outcome after open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2001; 33:913-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mva.2001.115164.

22. Huber T, Wang J, Derrow A, et al. Experience in the United States with intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2001; 33:304-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mva.2001.112703.

23. Lindholt J. Considerations and experiences of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Copenhagen: Fadl’s Forlag; 1998.

24. Wilmink A, Quick C. Epidemiology and potential for prevention of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Brit J Surg. 1998; 85(2):155-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00714.x.

25. Ferket B, Grootenboer N, Colkesen E, et al. Systematic review of guidelines on abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. J Vasc Surg. 2011; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.10.118.

26. Health Departments of the United Kingdom (1998). First Report of the National Screening Committee. National
Screening Committee, pp. 145. Available from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/
documents/digitalasset/dh_084456.pdf [cited 15 April 2011].

27. Health Departments of the United Kingdom (2000). Second Report of the UK National Screening Committee. National Screening Committee, pp. 1-29. Available from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4014560.pdf [cited 15 April 2011].

28. McGregor JC, Pollock JG, Anton HC. The value of ultrasonography in the detection of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Scot Med J. 1975; 20:133-7.

29. Leger A, Spencely M, McCollum C, Mossa M. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a computer assisted cost-utility analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc. 1996; 11:183-90. http://www.ejves.com/article/S1078-5884%2896%2980049-9/abstract

30. Wilmink A, Forshaw M, Quick C, Hubbard C, Day N. Accuracy of serial screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms by ultrasound. J Med Screen. 2002; 9:125-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jms.9.3.125.

31. Lindholt J, Vammen S, Juul S, Henneberg E, Fasting H. The validity of ultrasonographic scanning as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc. 1999; 17(6):472-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.1999.0835.

32. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper – the basics of evidence-based medicine. 4th ed. BMJ Books. London: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.

33. NHS (2011). CASP tools – RCT appraisal tool. Available from: http://www.sph.nhs.uk/sph-files/casp-appraisal-tools/rctap9-praisaltool.pdf/view [cited 17 April 2011].

34. NHS (2011). Critical appraisal skills programme. Available from: http://www.sph.nhs.uk/what-we-do/public-health-workforce/resources/critical-appraisals-skills-programme/ [cited 17 April 2011].

35. Scott R, Wilson N, Ashton H, Kay D. Influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 5-year results of a randomized controlled study. Brit J Surg. 1995; 82(8):1066-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800820821.

36. Ashton H, Buxton M, Day N, et al. The multicentre aneurysm screening study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002; 360(9345):1531-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11522-4.

37. Norman P, Jamrozik K, Lawrence-Brown M, et al. Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm. Brit Med J. 2004; 329:1259-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7491.596.

38. Lindholt J, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg E. Hospital costs and benefits of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results from a randomised population screening trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc. 2002; 23(1):55-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2001.1534.

Winter 2013 – The Color of Medicine

Posted on by

The Color of Medicine.
 
Diana Salinas.
 
Author Affiliations:
College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

 
[button link=”http://msrj.chm.msu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/MSRJ-Winter-2013-The-Color-of-Medicine.pdf” type=”icon” icon=”download” color=green] Full Text Article PDF [/button]
 
Corresponding Author: Diana Salinas; email not available.
 
Key Words: N/A
 
Abstract:
’I will not permit considerations of religion, nationality, race, gender, politics, socioeconomic standing, or sexual orientation to intervene between my duty and my patient.’ This bullet point from the physician’s oath is engraved around the margins to remind us that as physicians we should treat and care for each patient equally and in an unbiased manner, but at the same time understand that a universal treatment plan will not apply to all patients.

 
Published: February 27, 2013
 
Senior Editor: N/A
 
Junior Editor: N/A
 
DOI: Pending
 
Citation:
Salinas D. The Color of Medicine. Medical Student Research Journal. 2013;2(Winter):2.
 
 
References:
N/A

Winter 2013 – Letter From the Editors

Posted on by

Letter From the Editors.
 
Chad Klochko, David Ortiz.
 
Author Affiliations:
College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

 
[button link=”http://msrj.chm.msu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/MSRJ-Winter-2013-Letter-from-the-Editors.pdf” type=”icon” icon=”download” color=green] Full Text Article PDF [/button]
 
Corresponding Author: Chad Klochko; Chad[at]msrj.chm.msu.edu
 
Key Words: N/A

 
Abstract:
The year 2013 is going to be a very exciting year for the Medical Student Research Journal (MSRJ). MSRJ has made great strides in the past 12 months and can look forward to a bright furture in the year ahead. We have more than tripled our editoral staff, which now consists of 12 second – through fourth – year medical students.

 
Published: February 27, 2013
 
Senior Editor: N/A
 
Junior Editor: N/A
 
DOI: Pending
 
Citation:
Klochko C, Ortiz D. Letter From the Editors. Medical Student Research Journal. 2013;2(Winter):1.
 
 
References:
N/A

MSRJ Travels!

Posted on by

[dropcap style=”font-size: 60px; color: #18453B;”] T [/dropcap]he board and elective students of MSRJ will travel across Michigan and the U.S. to spread the word about MSRJ. Our first stops are in Galveston, Texas for the National Student Research Forum and the GRMEP Research Day in Grand Rapids, MI at the end of April. Future travels may include Lansing, Kalamazoo, and Flint Research Days, and American College of Physician Meetings Continue reading →

Dr. Solomon on Publishing from a Journal’s Perspective

Posted on by

[dropcap style=”font-size: 60px; color: #18453B;”]D[/dropcap]r. Solomon, an author, expert reviewer and editor gave medical students experience driven advice on February 13th, 2013.  Dr. Solomon first informed the students of his expertise and then opened the floor to questions. Often reviewers struggle with giving constructive feedback to the authors; to this, Dr. Solomon noted it is important to be specific.

Continue reading →

Dr. Marc Basson on Clinician-Scientists

Posted on by
Reply

[dropcap style=”font-size: 60px; color: #18453B;”]O[/dropcap]n Wednesday January 30th, 2013, Dr. Marc Basson, Professor and Chair of the Michigan State University Department of Surgery, addressed the first and second year College of Human Medicine students enrolled in the MSRJ elective. Dr. Basson, an M.D.-Ph.D., opened his discussion on the advantages offered by having expertise in multiple disciplines with the following quote:

Continue reading →

Winter 2011 – 10 Minutes with Paul Hebert, Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Medical Association Journal

Posted on by

10 Minutes with Paul Hebert, Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Medical Association Journal.

Pamela Verma, Diane Wu.

Author Affiliations:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[button link=”http://msrj.chm.msu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/MSRJ-Spring-2011-10-minutes-with-Paul-Hebert-Editor-in-Chief-of-the-Canadian-Medical-Association-Journal.pdf” type=”icon” icon=”download” color=green] Full Text Article PDF [/button]

*Corresponding Author: Pamela Verma; pamverma[at]interchange.ubc.ca

Key Words: N/A

Abstract:
Background: Most medical students, at some point in their career, aspire to publish a research paper of enough significance to join the pages of the major international medical journals. At the helm of these journals are physicians renowned for their academic and research acumen; in Canada, one of these physicians is Dr. Paul Hebert. We sat down with Dr. Hebert to talk about submission tips, becoming a journal editor, and how he got the job. This feature is part of Editors in Medicine, an ongoing series within student medical journals. Other interviews will be published periodically in various student journals internationally.
Published: June 30, 2011

Senior Editor: Andrew Wyman

Junior Editor: Steven Plato

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15404/msrj.001.001.winter/03

Citation:
Verma P, Wu D. 10 Minutes with Paul Hebert, Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Medical Association Journal. Medical Student Research Journal. 2011;1(Spring):8-9.

References:
N/A