Andrea Kubicki1, Haben Debessai1, Megan Masten1, Reena Pullukat1, Kirsten Salmela1
1College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
*Corresponding Author: Megan Masten; firstname.lastname@example.org
Key Words: Norway; healthcare; immigrant; barriers to care; language
Background: Documented immigrants eligible to stay in Norway for more than 6 months can enroll in the universal healthcare system for full healthcare services, such as acute, chronic, and preventative care.1 All other non-citizens only have access to emergency services. With an increasing influx of immigrants to Norway, it is advantageous to evaluate the Norwegian healthcare system, how documented and undocumented immigrants utilize the system, and any barriers they may face when doing so. The aim of this study is to identify barriers to healthcare for immigrants in Norway in order to better address them in the future.
Methods: Sixteen subjects with knowledge of immigrant healthcare in Norway were interviewed. Participants were asked the same standardized four questions; answers were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed.
Results: Major themes that emerged included the following: (1) universal access is a benefit once accepted into the system, (2) timeliness is an issue, (3) chronic disease and mental health are common immigrant-specific health issues, and (4) language and lack of cultural competency are major barriers to care.
Conclusion: There is a need for improved translation services and cultural competency as the immigrant population in Norway increases.
Published: Spring, 2019
1. Goth UG, Berg JE. Migrant participation in Norwegian health care. A qualitative study using key informants.
Eur J Gen Pract 2010; 17(1): 28–33. doi:10.3109/1381478 8.2010.525632.
2. Preamble to the Constitution of WHO as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19 June–22 July 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of WHO, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948.
3. Bollini P. Health policies for immigrant populations in the 1990s. A comparative study in seven receiving countries.
Int Migrat 1992; 30 (Special Issue: Migration and Health in
the 1990s): 103–19.
4. Summary Report on the MIPEX Health Strand & Country Reports. pp. 1–101, Rep. No. 52. 2016. Brussels: International Organization for Migration. Available from: https://publications. iom.int/system/files/mrs_52.pdf [cited 15 August 2016].
5. CooperB. Migrant quality, not quantity. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. 2005. Available from: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/norway-migrant-quality-not- quantity [cited 16 July 2018].
6. Large diversity in little Norway. ssb.no. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/en/befolkning/artikler-og-publikasjoner/ large-diversity-in-little-norway. Published 2019 [cited 21 March 2019].
7. Abebe DS. Public health challenges of immigrants in Norway: a research review. NAKMI Report 2010; 2.
8. Eli K, Ytrehus S. Barriers to health care access among undocumented migrant women in Norway. Soc Health Vulnerability 2015; 6(1): 28668.
9. This is Norway 2016: what the figures say. pp. 1–2. Statistics Norway. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/a/histstat/norge/ this-is-norway-2016.pdf [cited 15 August 2016].
10. Heim T. Problems of general practitioner’s care of migrants. Misunderstandings – Not only because of language. MMW Fortschr Med 2004; 146: 4–6.
11. Priebe S, Sandhu S, Dias S, Gaddini A, Greacen T,
Ioannidis E, et al. Good practice in health care for migrants: views and experiences of care professionals in 16 European countries. BMC Public Health 2011; 11(1): 187.
12. Jensen NK, Nielsen SS, Krasnik A. Expert opinion on best practices “in the delivery of healthcare services to immigrants in Denmark”. Dan Med Bull 2011; 57(8): A4170.
13. Mladovsky P. Migrant health in the EU. Eurohealth London 2007; 13(1): 9.
14. Wachtler C, Brorsson A, Troein M. Meeting and treating cultural difference in primary care: a qualitative interview study. Fam Pract 2005; 23(1): 111–15.